In-house document processing and review helps corporate legal teams easily reduce legal spend. Here’s a common-sense approach to moving review in-house.
Sign up for our news digest
Results for: Document review
Culling & Review
Responding to your discovery obligations is all about effectively and efficiently culling your data to separate the wheat (non-duplicative and non-privileged documents that are responsive to a discovery request) from the chaff (everything else). Earlier culling…
Don’t ask for a production you’re not prepared to review
Murphy v. Piper, Civ. In this class action, the court denied sanctions for a late-stage 2.5 million-page document production. None of that discovery was irrelevant or nonresponsive, making this a case of “be careful what you ask for, you just might get it.” The...
What Is Document Review?
Defining the document review phase of ediscovery What is document review? Also known as simply review, document review is the stage of the EDRM in which organizations examine documents connected to a litigation matter to determine if they are relevant, responsive, or...
What Is Technology-Assisted Review or TAR?
Using computers and AI to aid in ediscovery review What is technology-assisted review (TAR) or computer-assisted review (CAR)? Both terms refer to an approach within the document review phase of ediscovery that leverages computer algorithms to identify and tag...
What is AI or artificial intelligence?
Why computers learn by analyzing ediscovery data. What is AI? The short answer is that AI is short for artificial intelligence, which is the simulation of human intelligence by computers. Computers using AI can be said to think and learn based on experience and...
Court Orders Search Of Email Accounts
In this motion, the parties disputed several e-discovery issues, with the court balancing the burden of individual searches against the parties’ expected payoff and justifications.
Court Allows ‘Quick Peek’ of ‘Privileged’ Government Documents
Fairholme Funds, Inc. v. United States, No. 13-456C, 2017 WL 4768385 (Fed. Cl. Oct. 23, 2017). In this eminent domain case, the court granted the plaintiffs’ motion to compel a “quick peek” at approximately 1,500 documents that the government had withheld as...
How UX is Revolutionizing In-House Ediscovery
Bringing ediscovery to all by simplifying the user experience Before you ever write a line of code, you have to decide what values your product will implement. Zapproved has a strong tradition of creating easy-to-use, affordable and comprehensive software for...
‘Very Poor Practice’ in Preservation Offset by the Defendant’s Choice Not to Review
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Cuker Interactive, LLC, No. 5.14-CV-5262 (W.D. Ark. Jan 19, 2017). In this long-running contract case, the defendant, Cuker Interactive, requested sanctions against the plaintiff, Wal-Mart Stores (“Walmart”), for allegedly failing to preserve...
Sign up for our news digest