Ediscovery
PREX: The Evolution of a Community
PREX is about introducing you to colleagues, whether across town or across the country, who are navigating the same challenges and successes that you are.
Uptick in Corporate Internal Investigations
The Investigations Landscape: Findings From the H5/ATL 2019 Corporate Investigations Survey found that more than 60% of businesses surveyed anticipate managing a higher number of…
Thoughts on the 2019 Sedona Conference Annual Meeting
Brad Harris reflects on the 2019 Sedona Conference WG1 Annual Meeting
Best. Conference. Ever!
PREX was a truly inspiring event designed to promote excellence and innovation among ediscovery professionals.
2019 Corporate Ediscovery Benchmark Report
The 2019 report demonstrated that corporate ediscovery is hitting a transition point. As we unpacked the responses from the nearly 250 participants, we saw the…
Are you ready for the GDPR?
Use our GDPR 60-day countdown checklist to develop a compliance plan that balances the GDPR’s requirements with your e-discovery obligations.
2018 Ediscovery Checklist: 10 Tips
2018 Ediscovery Checklist: Corporate ediscovery trends in litigation hold and e-discovery software to help legal teams manage data collection and legal preservation in 2018
Court Refuses to Compel Disclosure of Archived E-Mails Due to “Undue Burden and Cost”
Court notes that when ESI is not reasonably accessible due undue burden or cost, it need not be provided unless the moving party demonstrates good…
“Rather Broad” Discovery Request Is Nonetheless Proportional to Case
First Niagara Risk Mgmt., Inc. v. Folino, No. 16-1779 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 11, 2016). The court concluded that the plaintiff’s requested scope of discovery from…
Judge Peck Refuses to Force Responding Party to Use Technology-Assisted Review
A plaintiff asked U.S. Magistrate Judge to order the defendant to use technology assisted review rather than the method preferred. The Judge refused.
Counsel Sanctioned for Misrepresentations and Citations to “Badly Out of Date” Federal Rules
If your case predates the December 2015 rule amendments, do not assume that it is automatically governed by the previous rules.
“Flagrant and Calculated” Perjury and Espionage Results in Significant Sanctions
The court ordered payment for a party intentionally destroying files, failing to safeguard evidence on his lost phone, and lying repeatedly under oath.