Zapproved
  • ZDiscovery
    • ZDiscovery Platform
    • – Hold Module
    • – Review Module
    • Pricing
    • Security
    • Request a Demo
  • Solutions
    • Legal Holds
    • In-Place Preservations
    • Data Processing
    • Culling and Review
    • Early Case Assessment
    • Internal Investigations
    • Information Requests
  • Resources
    • Resources
    • Blog
    • Events
    • Webinars
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Partners
    • Recognition
    • News Releases
    • Careers
    • Community Engagement
    • Contact Us
  • Login
  • See a Demo
Select Page

Second Verse Same as the First: Failure to Issue a Legal Hold is Gross Negligence

by Zapproved | Apr 27, 2010 | Case Law, Ediscovery, Resources

Crown Castle USA, Inc. v. Fred A. Nudd Corp., 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32982, (W.D.N.Y. Mar. 31, 2010)

Our friend Josh Gilliland of the Bow Tie Law blog posted last week about an important case out of the Western District of New York involving litigation holds.  (I highly recommend that you check out Josh’s entertaining overview “Raiders of the Lost Hard Drive” as well.)

The case, Crown Castle v. Nudd Corp., is a commercial litigation involving a product defect of a cell transmission tower. Crown Castle, a leading owner and operator of cellular towers, was suing Fred A. Nudd Corporation, one of the top manufacturers of transmitter towers.

During the course of the discovery process, the plaintiff made a number of missteps and mistakes.  After requesting information following the event that triggered the preservation obligation, counsel failed to monitor the approach used to determine where and what to look for in terms of responsive documents. Not surprisingly, the custodians missed a lot of information.  As discovery progressed, a great deal of responsive emails was subsequently uncovered, nearly half of the total eventually produced.  More troubling was that one of the afore-missing emails showed that there was a product defect. Oops.

The plaintiff also failed to take adequate steps to suspend the routine destruction of electronically-stored information, namely the automatic deletion of emails.  Older emails were automatically purged according to company procedure, resulting in spoliation. Double Oops.

Finally, the plaintiff failed to issue a litigation hold. In finding a “wholesale destruction” of responsive information, including that from key players, the Court concluded that the plaintiff “failed to take adequate measures to preserve electronic documents.”  Oops to the Nth degree.

The bad news is that the Court found the plaintiff to be grossly negligent for not issuing a legal hold. Another case aligning with The Pension Committee, an opinion that reaffirmed once again that absolute necessity to issue written holds as part of reasonableness and good faith.  The good news for the plaintiff (if there is good news after being found grossly negligent during discovery) — the court could not find evidence that the spoliation was done in bad faith.  A significant number of emails were able to be recovered from the recipients, and the Court could not determine that any missing emails were harmful to the defendant’s case.

There were plenty of things that didn’t go well for the plaintiff in this case, and their actions illustrated a laissez-faire attitude that many courts are frankly growing tired of.  And the bottom line is much of the bad behavior could have been avoided easily.  Implementing a legal hold using a simple tool like Legal Hold Pro would have raised awareness of the employees need to protect information pertinent to the case, allowed tracking of affirmative responses, and established a process for preservation that keeps a clear trail of accountability.  It’s clearly time for a new verse!

References:

  • Raiders of the Lost Hard Drive, Bow Tie Law (April 23, 2010)

Automatic email deletionlegal holds

  • Case Law
  • Zapproved News
  • Industry News
  • Events
  • Best Practices
  • Resources

Sign up for our news digest

Related Content

No reasonable anticipation of litigation given longstanding relationship and lack of communication about incident

No reasonable anticipation of litigation given longstanding relationship and lack of communication about incident

by Caitlin Lilly | Oct 17, 2019 | Case Law

In this breach of contract case, the court denied the plaintiffs’ motion for sanctions, finding that the defendants were under no duty to preserve evidence at the time of its loss.

Stormy seas, waves, clouds, wind as seen through a cruise ship porthole.

Preserved 91-minute video sufficient to capture ‘horrific storm’

by Zapproved | Oct 3, 2019 | Case Law

In this claim for injuries sustained during a boat cruise, the court began its opinion by noting that “a picture is worth a thousand words.” Given that, “surely a video must be worth significantly more” — and video evidence from 200 surveillance cameras worth yet more than that.

Silhouetted image of three defendants who deleted evidence before and after legal hold, then misrepresented its availability, resulting in spoliation sanctions.

Defendants deleted evidence before and after legal hold, then misrepresented its availability

by Zapproved | Sep 23, 2019 | Case Law

In this employment case, the magistrate imposed monetary sanctions and recommended an adverse inference jury instruction for the defendants’ spoliation of electronically stored information (ESI). Although the defendants were on notice of the plaintiff’s claims and had a clear obligation to preserve relevant information, they intentionally deleted her email and work data...

Zapproved logo

Founded in 2008, Zapproved builds easy-to-use litigation response software designed to help corporate legal teams drive down costs, reduce risk, and build a better process. With our unwavering commitment to keeping our 350+ corporate customers ridiculously successful, we are proud to have earned a 99% retention rate.

  • Products
  • ZDiscovery
  • Legal Hold Pro
  • Digital Discovery Pro
  • Security
  • Company
  • COVID-19
  • About Us
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Ediscovery Resources
  • Blog
  • Connect
  • Contact Us
  • Login
  • See a Demo
  • PREX
  • Webinars

    • Facebook

    • Twitter

    • LinkedIn
© 2021 Zapproved LLC. All rights reserved.
|
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy