scope of discovery
The plaintiff stated that he “will produce” responsive discovery when it is available; the court ordered him to supplement this inadequate response.
The court held that restoration of archived backup tapes, costing less than $13,000, was proportional where the amount in controversy was $20 million.
In this breach of contract and tortious interference case, the court partially granted and partially denied First American Bank's discovery request.
In this proposed class action, the court granted a motion compelling the defendant to produce e-discovery data to define the class of potential plaintiffs.